Search for: "MERRELL"
Results 41 - 60
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:05 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993), that “[e]xpert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading because of the difficulty in evaluating it. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:11 pm
The incident occurred shortly after 11 p.m. when the deputy made a traffic stop in the area of Merrell Road near Harper Road in Groveland. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and thus should not have been admitted nor relied upon. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Rule 702, Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Merrell, No. 20-30183 (6-10-22)(Hurwitz w/Sung; dissent by Boggs). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:16 pm
Merrell Down Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals in 1993, creating a new “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony in federal court, interested parties vigorously debated whether Daubert was a lax rule that would favor the admissibility of expert testimony, or a strict rule that would lead to the exclusion of a great deal of previously admissible expert evidence. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:20 pm
The law professors' amicus brief thinks the whole Smith—Merrell Dow—Grable line is wrong; in my federal jurisdiction class, we were taught that Smith made sense (where state law itself incorporated federal law, it could convey federal jurisdiction), but that the Court "messed everything up with a multi-factored triple bank shot" in Merrell Dow (at least, that's what my old class notes say). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:04 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
The Havner Hurdle Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:30 am
In Merrell v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993), held that the “Frye standard,” i.e., the long dominant legal standard that “expert” testimony must have “general acceptance” in the scientific community or other relevant areas of knowledge, was no longer the legal standard for admitting expert testimony in evidence. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:40 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., 509 U.S. 579 (U.S. 1993). [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593 (1993). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., laying down the foundation of admissibility of scientific expert testimony. [read post]
