Search for: "MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 126 F. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 11:28 pm by Mark Summerfield
  They are:to replace the current test of innovative step with a ‘higher’ standard based on the High Court’s decision in the ‘3M case’ (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd [1980] HCA 9; to require that innovation patent owners request examination/certification before the third anniversary of lodgement of their innovation patent; and to exclude from protection by an innovation patent all… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
., Oct. 29, 1998) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:45 am by Thomas Braun
In order to protect some industries, the House bill exempts any “iron mining extraction and processing facility” or “paper mill, wood products manufacturer, sawmill, or oriented strand board manufacturer” that would otherwise be subject to potential rate increases stemming from the standard. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am by Bexis
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Brackett served as Senior Vice President and Chief Science and Regulatory Officer for the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) and as Director of the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
Indeed the English Courts had for a long time expressed some discomfort with exercising jurisdiction over questions of infringement of foreign patents, for example, per Aldous J in Plastus Kreativ v Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. [1995] RPC 438 at 447:  “For myself I would not welcome the task of having to decide whether a person had infringed a foreign patent. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
., Oct. 29, 1998) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:34 am by Susan Perera
   These include 3M (previously Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AT&T (previously American Telephone and Telegraph Corporation), and BP (previously British Petroleum). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
In Minnesota, a company that has three manufacturing plants is hoping to change state law that could limit the number of asbestos claims stemming from a merger in the 1960s. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by J. Yackley
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 27 W.C.D. 379, 218 N.W.2d 458 (1974), the Court explained that:"[W]hen the usual tasks ordinary to an employee’s work substantially aggravate, accelerate, or combine with a pre-existing disease or latent condition to produce a disability, the entire disability is compensable, no apportionment being made on the basis of relative causal contribution of the pre-existing condition and the work activities. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Keep mine flying for closer battle. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:34 pm
Since 1990, the site has been occupied by Minnesota Corn Processors, a corn syrup manufacturer. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:06 pm
And after 1990, the site has been occupied by Minnesota Corn Processors, a corn syrup manufacturer. [read post]