Search for: "Macomber" Results 41 - 60 of 1,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 12:36 pm by Steven M. Gursten
This annual list of most dangerous intersections is provided by our attorneys to … Continue reading "Macomb County’s Most Dangerous Intersections in 2022" The post Macomb County’s Most Dangerous Intersections in 2022 appeared first on Michigan Auto Law. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:02 am by Tiana Guzman
In a recent holding by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the case of McLaren Macomb and Local 40 RN Staff Council, Office and Professional Employees, International Union (OPEIU), AFL-CI0, Case 07-CA-263041, there were significant implications for non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses that will severely limit the ability for employers to use these clauses pertaining to both union and non-union employees. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:04 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), this Court's decisions have uniformly held "income," for Sixteenth Amendment purposes, to require realization by the taxpayer. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Macomber that the 16th Amendment’s exemption from apportionment is limited to taxes on realized gains. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:07 am by Erik W. Weibust
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has found its first target under recent guidance issued in a memo from its General Counsel claiming that noncompete agreements may violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
  To buttress her ever-expanding view of Section 7, the GC cited the Board’s recent decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58, slip op. at 4, 7 (2023) which found non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements to violate the Act, finding “the ‘future rights of employees as well as the rights of the public may not be traded away’ in a manner which requires ‘forbearance from future . . . concerted activities. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Maribeth Meluch
Implications and Future Challenges The memorandum follows on the heels of the Federal Trade Commission issuing a proposed rule in January seeking to ban non-compete agreements, as well as the NLRB’s February ruling in McLaren Macomb, which held that severance agreements with broad non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions violate Section 7. [read post]
Notably, yesterday’s memo argues its expansion to non-compete restrictions is specifically based, in part, on the NLRB’s McLaren Macomb decision. [read post]
Following the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) highly-controversial decision in McLaren Macomb declaring most confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in separation agreements to be unlawful, General Counsel Abruzzo this week declared her intention to seek to invalidate nearly all post-employment non-compete agreements, in a memorandum stating her prosecutorial position that “the proffer, maintenance, and enforcement” of non-compete agreements… [read post]
Following the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) highly-controversial decision in McLaren Macomb declaring most confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in separation agreements to be unlawful, General Counsel Abruzzo this week declared her intention to seek to invalidate nearly all post-employment non-compete agreements, in a memorandum stating her prosecutorial position that “the proffer, maintenance, and enforcement” of non-compete agreements… [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:42 pm by Todd Hanchett and Emily Atmore
Finally, employers should continue to be mindful of the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) recent decision in McLaren Macomb and subsequent guidance issued by the General Counsel of the NLRB, which reinstate a limit on the confidentiality, nondisclosure, and non-disparagement clauses that employers may include in severance agreements with most of their lower-level employees. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:45 pm by Emily Atmore and Todd Hanchett
  While the Maclaren Macomb decision has been described as a return to the standard applied in earlier cases, many speculate that it indicates that the NLRB intends to take a broader view of how severance agreements infringe on employees’ rights under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
The Board has now reversed these 2020 additions with its recent ruling of McLaren Macomb, a case relating to the structure and content of severance agreements and their enforceability under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), stating its intention to return to a “plain language” determination. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:23 am by Erin Sutton
For more information on the McLaren Macomb decision, please look to Epstein Becker Green’s previous blog post. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:12 am by Nikki Mayo
The McLaren Macomb case involved furloughed employees that were offered a severance agreement containing non-disparagement language that prohibited them from making negative statements about the employer. [read post]
3 May 2023, 12:41 pm by Maribeth Meluch
(The mention of former employees here is interesting given its recent decision in McLaren Macomb Hospital where the Board took issue with certain provisions in severance agreements that would have restricted former employees from engaging with the Board.) [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:02 am by Bruce C. Judge
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently issued a decision in McLaren Macomb,  372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As a result of this law, Bristow asserts that he can no longer obtain newly filed divorce complaints from the State's Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court for Macomb County unless proof of service has been filed with the Macomb County Clerk or he has entered his appearance as a party's attorney of record. [read post]