Search for: "Marin-Marin v. Sessions" Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm by Francesca Procaccini
Pre-trial proceedings in the military commission case against the alleged masterminds of the September 11th attacks resume Wednesday morning, with all attorneys present but none of the accused in attendance. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
The cases scheduled for argument during the November session are below: United States Fish & Wildlife Service v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The three sessions can be watched on the Supreme Court website. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
"The Volt thrills me because it's the last thing anybody expected from GM," the ex-Marine said at a private lunch in Arlington today. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
China National Chartering Company Ltd v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, Gard Marine and Entergy Ltd  v China National Chartering Company Ltd & Anor, and Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, heard 1-3 November 2016. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:54 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the trial level:  An Article 39(a) session is scheduled for tomorrow and members selection is scheduled to begin on Tuesday in the capital court-martial of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
(3) If the Court of Session and/or the Sheriff Court do not have this power, does this constitute a breach of EU law? [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am by Susan Hennessey
Upcoming Proceedings and Developments in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
Plus, you specifically address the Navy-Marine courts findings that the appellant ought to have demanded speedy review. 3. [read post]