Search for: "Marshall v. California Supreme Courts et al"
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
The trial judge in Wells never made such a decision; indeed, the case was tried by the bench, before the Supreme Court decided Daubert. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
See Jan Rigby, et al., “Can physical trauma cause breast cancer? [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Committee on Armed Services
Inns of Court: An Historical Description of the Inns of Court and Chancery of England
1 v. (1909) Ringrose, Hyacinthe
International Problems and Hague Conferences
1 v. (1908) Lawrence, Thomas Joseph.
Also available in the International Yearbooks Library
Latin Phrases and Maxims: Collected from the Institutional and Other Writers on Scotch Law
1 v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor)… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In 1896, the Supreme Court weighed in once again on the question of race in Plessy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
In California, for example, in the appellate court’s decision in Gomes v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
