Search for: "Martin v. Public Safety "
Results 41 - 60
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2007, 5:34 am
Martin, 2005 U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
Louis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
Louis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:39 pm
District Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans has ruled to lift the moratorium on deepwater offshore drilling ((Hornbeck v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
Tarry, Jr., “Can Litigation-Generated Science Promote Public Health? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
And yet, our criminal justice system has failed on every count: public safety, fairness and cost-effectiveness. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm
Much has been made by progressive bloggers and commentators of the 17 energy investments owned by Judge Martin Feldman of the Federal District Court in New Orleans. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:07 am
Case citation: Welch v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1] At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:31 am
Middletown In 2012, in Clifton v. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Martin III, No. 1:17-cr-69, ECF No. 41 (March 6, 2017). [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:46 am
Supreme Court decision in Martin v Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission, the court had to defer to the Secretary. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 4:46 am
In the Cook County case of Chraca v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
For publication opinions today (5): In John R. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:52 pm
Mary Kay Green v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
The retreat issue would only be relevant if Martin were the aggressor, and Z had the opportunity to escape from Martin in complete safety. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
The law thus ends up supporting V’s thuggery, not with the specific purpose of doing so but with that effect: If V credibly tells D “go away or I’ll kill you,” D must flee (if he can do so with safety, which usually means that he’s fleeing a knife or an unarmed attack rather than a gun). [read post]
