Search for: "Marvel v. White" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
* Ninth Circuit Finds De Minimis Sampling of Sound Recordings Non-Infringing The Ninth Circuit has rejected the 2005 Bridgeport Music Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
The skin-tight piece that was designed for function rather than fashion so as to reduce the likelihood of blood clots was comparable to the costumes worn in the Marvel movies. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
Marvell's Attorney Odyssey The Recorder Marvell Technologies is struggling to escape a stock options tar pit. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tom Schmidt, in his marvelous contribution explaining how the Judges’ Bill of 1925 changed the implicit nature of Supreme Court decisions and authority, illustrates the point well. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
Marvel Comics, the legal battle for control over the comic-book characters created by artist Jack Kirby. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
See “Silicon Valley Engineer Convicted In Marvell Trade Secrets Case. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Humanitarian Law Project and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
Merpel marvels at the audacity of Fat Duck in defying the first court order. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Newline Cinema (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit vacates Catcher in the Rye injunction – applies eBay: Salinger v Colting (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit dismisses claims by Ms Lapine that Jessica Seinfeld’s ‘Deceptively Delicious’ was a rip off of her recipe book (The IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Copyright transfer termination notices subject California copyright heirs to jurisdiction in New York: Marvel Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Federal Court Justice Robert Bromwich admitted in court that his own white privilege means he is “quite challenged” by this case, which asks him to rule on what defines racism. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]