Search for: "Matter of Christian T. L."
Results 41 - 60
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm
I'm sure there will be robust debates on both sides of this issue, but for purposes of the courts, the answer doesn't matter. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
L. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
” To be sure, qualifies Dreher, “[t]his totalitarianism won’t look like the USSR’s. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 2:19 pm
You can't meet all these people in one day. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Czech Republic The District Court for Prague has ruled in favour of ex-West Ham defender Tomas Repka, who sued the tabloid Pestrý svět for publishing photographs of his work in the bakery during his prison sentence. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted in HOA changed rules after Black Lives Matter flag clash, homeowner says, ABC13.com (Mar. 25, 2021). [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 4:06 pm
You can't meet all these people in one day. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
L. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Either it means personal use or it means community military use; it can't mean both at once. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 11:10 am
The committee will hear testimony from Meredith Broussard, associate professor at the Arthur L. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
Meade, 19 L. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am
Police Dep't of City of Chicago v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
A judge can't rule on a case if he has a pecuniary interest in the result. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:27 am
As it turns out, the CRB extended the filing deadline for comments due to what they said was a technical difficulty, although we have yet to meet anyone who couldn’t file their comment on time. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
L. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
By way of background, following are short summaries of the commenters’ respective biographies demonstrating their respective significant interests in the subject matter of this proceeding. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Strains of this thinking formed the basis of the Christian right and fueled the GOP for decades. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"[130] But such a reduction in unfettered control wasn't seen as by itself posing a serious First Amendment problem: Turner rejected cable operators' "editorial control" claims as an argument for strict scrutiny[131]—and when it applied intermediate scrutiny, it didn't view the interference with editorial control as a basis for potentially invalidating the statute.[132] Nothing in the recent Janus v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 3:56 am
Ronald L. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:32 pm
But the reason it went wrong during this legislative term (which is already certain as the only thing that won't happen in June is a reform that actually moves the needle) is simply that those who wanted reform were C-L-U-E-L-E-S-S, but thought they knew how to win. [read post]
