Search for: "Matter of Doyle" Results 41 - 60 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2022, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Edelman & Edelman will keep Client informed of the status of this matter and consult with Client when appropriate. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
The court, however, must still reach the legal conclusion that those factual allegations establish a prima facie case (see Matter of Dyno v Rose, 260 AD2d 694, 698 [3d Dept 1999]). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am by Cassie J. Edgar
Cir. 1995) (holding that even though Chu’s “application claims to be a CIP of the Doyle patent,” some claims were not supported by Doyle alone, so for those claims “the Doyle patent was properly relied on as prior art”) Santarus, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Doyle (2021 ONSC 6655) privilege — information — disciplinary process — evidence — complaint. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm by Cookson Beecher
Other goals include improving the tilth of the soil by building up organic matter, reducing erosion, avoiding the use of antibiotics in food animals, and, with an eye on climate change, keeping more carbon in the soil. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 6:07 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he physician-patient privilege does not apply to an examination by a court-appointed physician” Doyle v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 11:34 pm by Ben Thorn
Ben has been listed as a recommended intellectual property lawyer in Doyle's Guide 2020 and 2021. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 11:34 pm by Ben Thorn
Ben has been listed as a recommended intellectual property lawyer in Doyle's Guide 2020 and 2021. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:17 am
From a recent "Wealth Matters" column in the NYT:"One issue that has not caught up with the technology is how NFTs will be taxed. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
It appears to be simple enough. 4 NYCRR 5.3[1]provides that except as otherwise provide therein, "every resignation shall be in writing" while §31(2) of the Public Officers Law requires that "[e]very resignation shall be in writing addressed to the officer or body to whom it is made. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
In other words, in this case if the allegations were indeed grave and  had been published to a substantial number of members of the Facebook group (which had a particular interest in the subject matter) then an inference of serious harm could be drawn. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:43 am by SHG
But what of having children — or getting married, for that matter — before establishing oneself? [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thus, “‘when it comes to Indian affairs, state courts are courts of limited jurisdiction'” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 296, quoting Bowen v Doyle, 880 FSupp 99, 114 [WD NY], affd 230 F3d 525 [2d Cir]). [read post]