Search for: "Matter of Gonzalez" Results 41 - 60 of 1,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2023, 5:15 pm by nyaccidentlaw
Stopping a motorcycle by force in any matter can result in serious injury and death, and so must be lawful, proportionate, and reasonable based on the circumstances. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:05 am by Margaret Myers
-led global order, for that matter — had run their course. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 11:53 am by HRWatchdog
”Tuesday, August 16 On Tuesday, the Assembly Appropriations is scheduled to take up the following employment-related Job Killer bills: SB 399 (Wahab; D-Hayward): Chills employer speech regarding religious and political matters, including unionization. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Cruz for Sexual Assault," and the body of the email states: Good afternoon Superintendent Gonzalez and UISD Board, A file-stamped copy of Plaintiff [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am by Dan Bressler
” “An unnamed Perkins Coie attorney was benchslapped by Northern District of California Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for trying to recruit one of her clerks mid-trial. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:01 am by HRWatchdog
SB 399 precludes employers from talking about religious or political matters. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
I believe it matters greatly whether the rule is considered a bar or a presumption. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
., 22-510Issue: Whether, when officers put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the floor and pushed into his back until he died, they are they entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law because the person struggled to breathe before dying. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:10 am by HRWatchdog
Chills employer speech regarding religious and political matters, including unionization. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm by Ben Sperry
  If omissions could be held liable in the absence of an independent duty to act, then there would be no limiting principle to prevent the application of liability far beyond what anyone (except for the cop in the final episode of Seinfeld) would believe reasonable:  [I]f aiding-and-abetting liability were taken too far, then ordinary merchants could become liable for any misuse of their goods and services, no matter how attenuated their relationship with the wrongdoer. [read post]
  As the first-ever Section 230 case before the Supreme Court, Gonzalez would have been significant no matter what, but its potential impact was so vast because of the expansiveness of the plaintiffs’ argument. [read post]