Search for: "Matter of Horn v Horn"
Results 41 - 60
of 423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2016, 1:00 am
With bated breath this writer awaited the decision, which was published yesterday.The case of PMS International Group Plc v Magmatic Limited dealt with the Trunki travel case, designed by Robert Law in the late 1990s (at the time called the 'Rodeo'). [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:04 am
Here’s an excerpt from the complaint, Van Dyke Horn LLC v Peter Van Dyke: This case is about an equity member, officer and high-level executive of VDH, Peter Van Dyke, intentionally diverting and misappropriating trade secrets of VDH and converting assets of VDH, including clients, for his own benefit after failing to force his partner, Marilyn Horn, to sell her interest in VDH to him for pennies. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Horne v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
If an employee has been served with disciplinary charges, his or her right to a disciplinary hearing survives his or her retirement from the position Matter of Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U), September 12, 2008, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0100105/2008, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am
The August 2023 High Court case of Horn & Another v Nel & Others discusses when, in terms of Section 3(2) of the Arbitration Act, a court can set aside a valid arbitration agreement. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
Bobby v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am
To me, Petrella v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 10:45 am
Summary of Decision issued July 7, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rohrer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
” In Johns v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:56 am
Horn et al, Nos. 05-9006 & 9008 (3d Cir. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Trent Horne and Edward (Ted) Yoo In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has provided valuable guidance to patent agents and litigators as to how Canadian patents will be read and enforced (Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60). [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 11:09 am
The style of the case is, Gary Arkinson v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
Horn, 2011 U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Meri V. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:10 am
Lazzarone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 5:56 am
Robart will hold a Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
Summary of Decision issued March 23, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Excel Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Trent Horne and Edward (Ted) Yoo In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has provided valuable guidance to patent agents and litigators as to how Canadian patents will be read and enforced (Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60). [read post]
