Search for: "Matter of J.S."
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Matter of V.C. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:06 am
The court says it lacks subject matter jurisdiction because Backpage can’t show an injury-in-fact from the unenforced law. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 2:43 pm
In so doing, J.S. alleged, the website had contributed to J.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
. * J.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 12:51 am
One month before he died, Gould completed re-recording the work that had first made him famous, the Goldberg Variations of J.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
’s allegations in the light most favorable to J.S., as we must at this stage, J.S. alleged facts that, if proved true, would show that Backpage did more than simply maintain neutral policies prohibiting or limiting certain content. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:09 am
J.S., a newly unpublished (not precedential) decision from the Appellate Division where a final restraining order entered against a defendant in a domestic violence matter was vacated due to a lack of sufficient evidence and based on a finding that the “procedures employed at trial deprived defendant of fundamental due process. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:53 pm
Read the opinion here: In the Matter of the Expungement Petition of J.S. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Adoption of a Minor: Two Married Women and a Donor The dispute in this case arose when J.S. and V.K., a married, same-sex couple, filed a joint petition to adopt the biological child of J.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
J.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
The specific evidentiary issues in this matter centered around the Plaintiff's cross-examination of the defense medical expert.Under the well-established rule of law that holds that a witness cannot be cross-examined on collateral matters, see J.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:41 am
As a threshold matter, it seems clear that Rigney’s decision to withhold evidence of J.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
J.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:01 pm
” No.1: J.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
For civil matters, the standard is the balance of probabilities, ie., who and what do you believe while in criminal matters, the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
For civil matters, the standard is the balance of probabilities, ie., who and what do you believe while in criminal matters, the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
In the course of the welding fume litigation, defense counsel sought underlying data and documentation from a study published by Dr. [read post]
23 May 2014, 7:42 pm
In the 2012 case of J.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:57 am
District and J.S. ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Match.com; J.S. v. [read post]
