Search for: "Matter of Jost" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 10:07 pm by FDABlog HPM
Blume takes over the office from Kenneth Jost who has served as Acting Director for just under two months. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:31 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
• Jakub Jost, 'Joined Cases C-92/09 AND c-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke GbR Hartmut Eifert v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Amy Howe
  At the very least, whichever side prevails in the passport matter will be bolstered politically in its fight with the other side. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
• Jakub Jost, 'Joined Cases C-92/09 AND c-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke GbR Hartmut Eifert v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:12 pm
"Congress isn't going to do anything between now and the election," says Timothy Jost, a professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Congressional Quarterly, Kenneth Jost reports on the continuing “imbalance between male and female lawyers” in Supreme Court arguments. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:56 am by Frank Pasquale
.* Health law scholars like Tim Jost have great (and positive) impact as they help on advisory bodies considering knotty issues in insurance law. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost takes a look at “the brave new world of Supreme Court fandom,” noting that Ginsburg and Thomas, “one from each of the ideological blocs, now have web sites created by ardent fans to celebrate their lives, times, and jurisprudence,” and lamenting that “the idolizing puffery may make an already overly politicized court appear to be that much more partisan as partisanship rages unabated outside the Marble Palace. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
”  Kenneth Jost at his Jost on Justice blog also concludes that “the Roberts Court is willing to put the First Amendment at some risk, trusting assurance from a government that since 9/11 has proved none too trustworthy on national security matters. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:07 am by Randy Barnett
“As a judicial matter, it’s also unprecedented. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, who observes that jurors “may bring other kinds of bias into the jury room, but those cases are no reason to back away from one limited safeguard against the racial discrimination that still pervades criminal justice in the United States,” and from Mark Joseph Stern in Slate, who asks how, if Chief Justice John Roberts does not recognize the pernicious effects of racial bias in this case, Roberts can “ever… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost writes that although the “Supreme Court has yet to issue any decisions this term, … the justices’ partisan tilt can be seen in several of the term’s early case-selecting decisions. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
The parties have had their say and the matter is in the justices’ hands. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The court concluded that invalidation of the individual mandate would not prevent most of the ACA from being fully operative as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:45 am by Jeff Foust
“The decision on specific contractual quantity and period of commitment will be balanced among price, operational requirements, budget realities and the potential for new entrant competition,” Deputy Secretary of Defense Ronald Jost wrote in a letter to the GAO. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:38 pm by Jacek Stramski
Amad, 730 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), excluding testimony of witness tampering would be “fundamentally unfair” and the “threshold question is whether the matter is relevant. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost remarks on the Federalist Society’s role in picking Gorsuch. [read post]