Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 41 - 60
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2022, 12:59 am
But that is a matter of form, not substance. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:32 am
Gore, and Robert Pushaw's criticism of Bush v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:33 am
In this post, Angus Maudslay, an associate in the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comments on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Fylde Coast Farms Ltd (formerly Oyston Estates Ltd)) v Fylde Borough Council [2021] UKSC 18, which concerns whether section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 should be interpreted to mean that an application for judicial review was made out of time. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:04 pm
Brief for Orin Kerr as Amicus Curiae 7 (urging adoption of code-based approach). [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:32 pm
Brief for Orin Kerr as Amicus Curiae 7 (urging adoption of code-based approach). [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
Guidance has also been provided by the Court of Final Appeal as to how such possible inconsistencies should be approached as a matter of construction. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:43 pm
Co-blogger Orin Kerr wrote a helpful post that explains the current state of Fourth Amendment doctrine. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Those hypotheticals are implicated by Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm
” The import of that second definition is currently before the Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:32 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am
AB v London Borough of Barnet. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 4:58 am
In the Supreme Court, Lord Kerr, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows heard the matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
Lord Thomas and Lord Kerr both agreed with Lord Briggs’ judgment, but Lord Kerr passed away a few days prior to the scheduled date for handing down the judgment. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
In Musacchio v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Kerr, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, Lord Leggatt, and Lord Thomas. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 3:18 pm
See Daubert v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
The majority of three (Lords Kerr, Hamblen and Leggatt) favoured the location of the seat as determinative in this case. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the dissenting judgment, with which Lord Reed agreed: they would both have allowed the appeal. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, and Lady Arden. [read post]
