Search for: "Matter of Lilly"
Results 41 - 60
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
This moggy has been kept busy over the last 24 hours with matters of partiality at the EPO, Swiss form claims, and Bolar exemption in UK and under unitary patent, and then, no sooner was he thinking of emerging from the deluge, fellow Kat Annsley kindly drew his attention to the eagerly awaited substantive decision in the case of Actavis v Lilly (as we shall call it for short - you may wish to call it Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:33 am
In my recent essay, I wrote that – apart from its value in "new matter" rejections – the role of the written description requirement in ex parte prosecution is negligible. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
Lilly’s amicus brief, filed in support of neither party, argued that new test is required to simplify the line between patent-eligible and ineligible subject matter, as [i]t is as best intellectually challenging to meaningfully apply the tripartite exclusions from patenting for laws of nature, natural phenomena and abstract ideas. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:32 am
No surprise here:It was probably just a matter of when, not if, President Bush would threaten to veto the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:10 pm
Eli Lilly and Company (Fed. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 7:31 am
The Illinois Review Board recommends a 15-month suspension of an attorney Count I pertains to Respondent's representation of two sisters, Barbra Marks and Bettye Kelly, in matters related to the estate of their mother, Lillie Burnett (Burnett). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:30 am
This appeal considered whether a new pemetrexed based cancer treatment produced by Actavis UK Ltd & others infringes Eli Lilly & Co’s patent and its foreign designations either indirectly under the Patents Act 1977, s 60(2) (matter for appeal) or directly under a proper interpretation of the Europe Patent Convention 2000, art 69 (matter for cross-appeal). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
Arnold J dismissed an allegation of added matter, and that claim 1 of the Patent lacks novelty over International Patent Application No. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
It did not really matter for the purposes of this claim which company in the Actavis group was claimant. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Rindner was reacting to an assertion by Lilly lawyer George Lehner that drug regulation is a matter for the federal Food and Drug Administration, not any state. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:04 am
Further readingNothing to see here, Lilly wins in kicking out Genentech's Talz progeny patent (for now) (Feb 2020)Another case of catastrophic comma loss (T 1473/19): Interpreting the claims in view of the description (Jan 2023)Adding matter by amending the description to exclude embodiments (Ensygnia v Shell [2023] EWHC 1495 (Pat)) (Aug 2023)Image credit: DALLE-3 [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 9:00 pm
The scheme and FCPA violations mirrored an earlier FCPA enforcement action, also brought by the SEC as a civil matter, rather than by the Department of Justice (DOJ) as a criminal matter, against another US entity Schering-Plough, for making charitable donations in Poland which violated the FCPA. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:13 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., No. 2010-1105 (Fed. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:35 am
" Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:36 am
"You might ask why Lilly waited so long. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
Moreover, it is insufficient that prior art merely includes separate references to the subject matter of a subsequent patent claim. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The district court granted Eli Lilly’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that the drug warning was adequate as a matter of law and that it was not the producing cause of Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 2:56 pm
The matter of using a tradename in a claim arose Moreover, the prosecution history confirms that the inventors used “ALIMTA” in the original claims—and the Examiner understood the term—as Lilly’s trade name for pemetrexed disodium. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Lilly for a few years. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm
I believe that if you work hard and do a good job, you should be rewarded no matter what you look like, where you come from, or what gender you are. [read post]
