Search for: "Matter of Marriage of Richardson"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:02 am
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Richardson & Anor v DPP. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:44 am
They transcend any importance to deciding whether Mary Kennedy was the victim or the perpetrator of a marriage gone bad. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
Early in their marriage, they suffered substantial financial losses in the construction business. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm
" [name withheld] and I met earlier this year at his older sister’s house in Plano, where he lives with his soft-spoken wife Nicole and their four children, two from Nicole’s first marriage and a toddler and infant with [name withheld]. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 4th District.Criminal law -- First-degree grand theft -- Jury instructions -- Good faith defense -- Trial court erred in refusing to give requested special instructions on good faith, the lack of criminal implications for a disagreement regarding contract interpretation, and the definition of “petroleum contaminated water” (PCW) set forth in the Florida Administrative Code, where defendants, under contract to remove water contaminated with jet fuel from… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
One group of amici modestly explained that “peer review referees and editors limit their assessment of submitted articles to such matters as style, plausibility, and defensibility; they do not duplicate experiments from scratch or plow through reams of computer-generated data in order to guarantee accuracy or veracity or certainty. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:22 am
For example, if the non-custodial parent is paying child support from a previous marriage, the court will consider that obligation also. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Abstract: Presenting an interweaving example of the discursive hierarchical and hegemonic power constructs that are typically prevalent within family law cases, this performative narrative presents a ‘verbal space-as-text’ framework highlighting the complexities of power relations, social conventions and immigration, while challenging traditional beliefs and assumptions about the norms of marriage and divorce. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 2:31 am
Richardson, we can argue the nuanced points all day long. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Richardson and Califano v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Richardson thus has no democratic or constitutional legitimacy. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Richardson v. [read post]
