Search for: "Matter of Mendoza" Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2020, 7:54 am by Gene Killian
(By the way, for a New Jersey case involving a fraudulent certificate, take a look at Mendoza v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 7:54 am by Gene Killian
(By the way, for a New Jersey case involving a fraudulent certificate, take a look at Mendoza v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Court Debates Using Shell Companies to Mask Political Donations Bloomberg Law – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 1/10/2020 A federal appeals court panel heard arguments over the use of shell companies to hide donations in a case that could affect super PAC disclosure in the 2020 election. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am by MOTP
"In seven additional paragraphs in her affidavit, Martin testifies to matters unrelated to Educap's recordkeeping methods. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 11:51 am by Samuel Bray
As a matter of policy, it depends on what weight one gives to the Mendoza decision and the policies implicated in the non-acquiescence debate in the 1980s. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 1:10 pm by Jon Sands
The matter is not moot because the defendant pled and received a 196 month sentence. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:10 am by Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon
That avenue of relief has been closed down by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in a newly released decision of Matter of Mendoza-Hernandez, Matter of Capula-Cortes, 27 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2019). [read post]
1 May 2019, 1:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” The magistrate pointed out that it was far from clear that even injunctive relief would interfere with a DOC contract—requiring Mendoza to surrender his own property “appears to be a matter of DOC policy, not contract. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
His presentation included a discussion of judicial developments relating to the Texas law of intestacy, wills, estate administration, trusts, and other estate planning matters. 2. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Munoz-Mendoza, 385 Mass. 184, 188, 430 N.E.2d 1214, 1217 (Mass. 1985). [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm by Marty Lederman
Mendoza (1984), that offensive, nonmutual collateral estoppel does not apply against the federal government). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:06 pm
Oddly, after framing this as a matter of balancing, the court led with a categorical distinction. [read post]