Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G." Results 41 - 60 of 2,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
The claim was then given directions to trial of claim and counterclaim, on Mr Bs proposed directions, as the ‘advocate’ for Mr G had not prepared any directions. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:58 am by Meg Martin
Donnell, Judge.Representing Opportunity: Alan G. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:46 am by Dennis Kiker
The rule says this: “Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense[.] [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
This, in the Board's view, constitutes a sufficient reason to admit D18 into the proceedings.1.3 Contrary to the respondent's argument, it could not be expected that the appellant would immediately react to this new and brief submission by requesting anew, during the oral proceedings, to admit D18 into the proceedings. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
electrons, which ligand(s) is (are) chosen from CO and NO2+; the total electron charge q of the complex to which L1, L2 and L3 contribute and the ionic charge of the metal M being positive and equal to 1 or 2; the anionic borate entity of which has the formula                in which: a and b are integers ranging, for a, from 0 to 3 and, for b, from 1 to 4 with a + b = 4, the symbols X… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
  Joa objected to these amendments again claiming that they lacked novelty and inventive step, that they resulted in the specification disclosing additional matter contrary to s 76(3)(a) Patents Act 1977 (the 1977 Act), and that they lacked clarity contrary to s 14(5)(b) 1977 Act. [read post]