Search for: "Matter of Sorrell" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2010, 6:22 am by Jamie Spencer
First, from Benyth, a good question: Why is this person still on the bench, or for that matter, even in the bar??? [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 5:44 am
Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n (corporations can assert religious interests of their shareholders), and Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:45 pm by Morgan Weiland
Understanding how these corporate speech claims are possible matters, and excavating the theoretical work in the Court’s opinions helps uncover what’s been going on beneath the doctrinal surface. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
Sorrels, 906 N.E.2d 788 (Ill.App. 4 Dist. 2009) was approached on foot by a police officer for no reason whatsoever. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:17 am
Scott Sorrels, a partner with Powell Goldstein specializing in corporate securities and regulatory matters and a former enforcement attorney with the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 9:27 am
"We have a water permit we think is a good water permit, and we need it to run the refinery," said Stan Sorrels, BP health, safety, security, and environmental manager. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatedly: The applicant’s viewpoint about the term or the targeted group matters not at all. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:08 am
No matter what you come up with, it will not prevent something like this from occurring again. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:31 am by Lowell Brown
Leadership changes Randy Sorrels and Laura Gibson, both of Houston, will be sworn in today as president-elect and board chair, respectively. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
Here are a couple of non-litigation related matters that we thought our readers need to know about.First, the FDA. [read post]
(Although as a general matter, voting within state and local government must follow the one-person, one-vote rule of Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
The basic thrust of the piece is to argue that the Roberts Court has become “the judicial voice of the idea that nearly everything works best on market logic, that economic models of behavior capture most of what matters, and political, civic, and moral distinctions mostly amount to obscurantism and special pleading. [read post]