Search for: "Matter of TR"
Results 41 - 60
of 668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Ex. 1; Tr. 6-7). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 3:03 am
Metropolitan Tr. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
As a matter of constitutional practice, a bifurcated model of the strength of constitutional rights has assumed increasing prominence in recent decades. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
In Liciaga v New York City Tr. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:04 am
Bd. of Trs., Public Employees Retirement System, 425 N.J. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
AUTO - LATE NOTICE OF SUIT - PREJUDICE REQUIRED American Tr. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
The courts have limited power when reviewing an arbitration award, indicated an arbitrator "exceed[s] his [or her] power [within the meaning of the statute] where the ... award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power", citing Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
The courts have limited power when reviewing an arbitration award, indicated an arbitrator "exceed[s] his [or her] power [within the meaning of the statute] where the ... award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power", citing Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sequino v Sears Holdings, 206 AD3d 1408and Matter of Ippolito v NYC Tr. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sequino v Sears Holdings, 206 AD3d 1408and Matter of Ippolito v NYC Tr. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 5:18 am
Case/matter management. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm
TR Investors, LLC, No. 592,2010, 2011 WL 2802832 (Del. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Tr. 52:19-53:4. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s imposing a “lesser disciplinary penalty” upon remand found to have usurped the authority of the arbitrator under the circumstancesFernandez v New York City Tr. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 4:31 am
The Montana Supreme Court exercised supervisory control in a matter in which it is alleged that Montana State University - Bozeman negligently hired and failed to protect a student from a predatory professor. we find that exercise of supervisory control... [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Only the union or the employer may demand that an issue be submitted to arbitrationNew York City Tr. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:08 am
Arbitrator’s award based on a finding of “past practice” did not modify the collective bargaining agreement between the partiesMatter of Romaine v New York City Tr. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
In the end, it only matters that the law firm was given notice of the claims. [read post]