Search for: "Matter of Vance v Roberts" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm by Ilya Somin
“Third,” Roberts continues, “courts should be attentive to the nature of the ev­idence offered by Congress to establish that a subpoena ad­vances a valid legislative purpose. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
Next, Miller called Robert Sibert, a retired FBI forensic scientist and Booz Allen contractor. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
California; thirty senators found the matter pressing enough to warrant watching the questionable films to make their own judgments. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Among preliminary matters, Michael Schwartz, counsel for Walid Bin’Attash, is withdrawing from the case. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]