Search for: "Matter of Victoria J." Results 41 - 60 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Id. at 1309 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28, cmt. j). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Beaudette (Oxford College of Emory University) and Laura Weinstein (independent scholar) on "why a 1972 Northern Ireland murder matters so much to historians"; Margaret A. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:39 am by Alison Rowe
 George was represented by Thomas Corea of the Corea Law Firm, PLLC in that matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:44 pm
 Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Victoria Registry, dealing with this issue. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:00 am
Levi of Carlton DiSante & Freudenberger in the firm's California Labor & Employment Law Blog What's the matter with Farmer's Branch...again? [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
N A Moreham is Professor of Law at Victoria University of Wellington and an editor of The Law of Privacy and the Media (3rd ed) (OUP, 2016). [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
  There was a comment on the DLA Piper “Privacy Matters” blog. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “ICO appears to announce yet further delays to BA and Marriott investigations”. [read post]
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
The alternations were not signed in accordance with the requirements of the Wills Act, RSBC 1996, c. 489.In the words of Burnyeat J. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a piece “Europe: Interim EDPB guidance on the application of GDPR to health research”. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm by Legal Beagle
She has reported the matter to the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, who confirmed yesterday they were investigating. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In order to establish infringement, it first had to be determined whether the Combination Sign was two signs used together (infringement under s10(1) of the Trade Marks Act (TMA) 1994, for use of identical signs for identical goods) or whether the sign was one sign (infringement under s10(2) TMA 1994, for use of a similar sign for identical goods).After reviewing all of the evidence presented, Hacon J stated that the distinction between the Combination Sign being one or two signs did… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
The case involves a claim of invalidity of Fontem’s Patent EP2022349 related to an electronic cigarette as well as for a declaration of non-infringement and a counterclaim for infringement.BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous prioritiesDavid Brophy blogs about the order in case G 1/15 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO, which establishes that partial priority of a claim comprising alternative subject-matter may not be refused based on one or more generic expressions or… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Lopez de Victoria, 66 M.J. at 74 (C.A.A.F.2008) (Ryan, J., dissenting) I would hold that we have no jurisdiction over this case in its present procedural posture. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm by James McComish
Her Honour concluded (at [21]-[22]): Non compliance with an anti-suit injunction is a grave matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Europe: EDPB issues Recommendations on Supplementary Measures and European Essential Guarantees for surveillance measures following Schrems II”. [read post]