Search for: "Matter of Washington v Edwards" Results 41 - 60 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Smita Ghosh
” In the same publication, Attorney Alyson Clair Decker reviews You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
An exellent article written by Duke University Third Year law strudent, Edward Boeme, Warrantless GPS in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
It’s a blustery day in Washington as the court prepares for opinions. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Joseph Margulies
  But a few days later, the Washington Post and the Guardian made Edward Snowden a household name. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm by Cindy Cohn
This copying, even if the messages are only retained briefly, matters under the law. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
Edward Swaine analyzes the decision for the George Washington University Law School’s On the Docket blog and concludes that, “[i]f the Court cares about the broader issue, it might have been better for it to decide—if it chose to enter into the controversy at all—whether Congress truly enjoys the capacity to ‘infringe on the recognition power’ in a way that matters for these myriad variants. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Edward Foley offers the third in a series of essays discussing Benisek v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
The court, for example, unanimously struck down a California law in Edward v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
It’s unseasonably mild on this last Monday of June in Washington. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Marissa Miller
Also at this blog, Edward Hartnett recaps last week’s oral arguments in Martel v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am by Josh Blackman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in King v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Shatzer (08-680), arguing that it will require the Court to create a bright-line rule clarifying its decision in Edwards v. [read post]