Search for: "Matter of Working Families Party v Fisher" Results 41 - 49 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Wade, are in far less peril than more recent decisions, such as the affirmative action case of Fisher v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
I haven’t any reason to doubt or for that matter to believe Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
It was a family law matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
” Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
” Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case. [read post]