Search for: "Matter of Zapata v Zapata"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S.1 (1972)). [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
ROBERT JEFFERSON v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:22 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED, No. 13-0573 (Tex. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Sup. 2013) (plaintiff “must adduce proof that he or she would have read and heeded a warning had one been given”); Zapata v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
RETAMCO OPERATING, INC.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-06-00346-CV, 248 SW3d 314, 10-17-07)08-0128IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEZELLER WILLICH, DECEASED; from Henderson County; 12th district (12-06-00409-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-21-07)motion to amend dismissed as moot08-0140CYNTHIA HIEGER AND ROY C. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
See Newell Com- panies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:48 am
The following analysis is from Travis Laster: Now, there is a third important decision from Chancellor Chandler in the Maxim option backdating case: Ryan v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:39 pm
See, for example, Zapata v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
To determine whether the district court properly dismissed a claim based on a forum selection clause, the appeals court turned to the Supreme Court’s decision in M/S Bremen v Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm
It is no surprise that the courts are extremely protective/jealous of their power when a matter is connected to the forum. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
That is, the duty to evaluate a derivative action claim by the board of directors under Delaware case law, Zapata v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
More precisely, the vast majority of landmark CISG cases have come from the judicial realm, including the well-known and controversial cases such as the New Zealand mussels case, Zapata Hermanos v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
That is, the duty to evaluate a derivative action claim by the board of directors under Delaware case law, Zapata v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
Court of Appeals noted on Goss Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
The prosecution estoppel argument was not "so clear-cut that it was unreasonable for Medtronic to litigate the question until it obtained a ruling from the district court on the matter. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
