Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm by Rosalind Early
­McDonnell, DSc ’06, MBA ’14, former chairman of the board of ­McDonnell Douglas Corp., were together in the Overseas Press Club in New York City to announce the university’s new global initiative, the McDonnell International Scholars Academy. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:40 am by Kyle Dudek
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the familiar burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The Eleventh Circuit noted that a plaintiff who brings intentional-discrimination claims has several options available to her: [O]ne of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:48 am by David Markus
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:21 pm by Jessica Perry
” The Tenth Circuit noted that some sister circuits have disagreed, but opined that those courts reached the wrong conclusion based on an erroneous interpretation of the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm by Anthony Zaller
Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 (2003) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
He was later selected for training to be a first officer on a McDonnell Douglas MD-11 aircraft, a “wide-body” aircraft that would qualify him for a higher pay grade. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Through application of the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Through application of the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am by Chris Lazarini
Through application of the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]