Search for: "McFarlane v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:05 am
The concept was previously stated in Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am
The Court held that, in principle, the right to respect for private life under Article 8 can extend to the professional lives of the social worker and police officer (R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health and R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Perhaps also, we should reconsider the decentralization v centralization binary as a central concern for how local government actually operates. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:41 pm
In my mind, this was as astonishing example of thoughtless, cookie-cutter justice at its worst.I recalled this incredibly unpleasant experience as I read the recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision of State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
McFarlane, 207 S.W.3d 52, 56 (Mo. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
Free Speech Paternalism and Free Speech Exceptionalism: Pervasive Distrust of Government and the Contemporary First Amendment , Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 76, 2015, U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 26557000, Ronald J. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 3:40 pm
By indictment filed in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Maryland, the State charged appellant, Jermain Jamal Williams, with robbery with a deadly weapon of Norman McFarlane, robbery with a deadly weapon of Meghan Walker, first-degree assault of Shamariah Yehudah, first-degree assault of Damion Dixon, attempted second-degree murder of Officer Pierre Boone, and related charges. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
On 2 and 3 March 2015, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will heard the appeal in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
