Search for: "Mccarthy v. Cir" Results 41 - 60 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CAFC Reverses TTAB Affirmance of Section 2(d) "TAKETEN" Refusal
17 Dec 2014, 4:09 am
Cir. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
CAFC Affirms TTAB: WEIGEL'S KITCHEN & Design Not Confusable With QT KITCHENS & Design
8 Jan 2021, 3:49 am
Cir. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
TTAB Dismisses SUPERCORE Opposition: No Likelihood of Confusion with U-CORE and No Intent to Deceive in Misuse of the “R” Symbol
17 Oct 2018, 3:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
"False advertising" claim fails in Seat Sack v. Childcraft
30 Mar 2011, 11:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Co. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
S.D.N.Y. Notes Split Re Whether a Federal Court Has the Authority to Order a Federal Sentence be Served Concurrently with a Future State Sentence
1 Apr 2007, 10:18 pm
Per U.S. v. [read post]
Split Circuits - http://splitcircuits.blogspot.com/
1-800 SKI VAIL Doesn't Infringe--Vail Associates v. Vend-Tel-Co
11 Feb 2008, 11:45 am
Vend-Tel-Co., Ltd., 2008 WL 342272 (10th Cir. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Got Confusion? “Chikin” v. “Kale” and Trademark Protection for Parodies in the Form of Products
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm by LTA-Editor
Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 32:63 (4th ed.). [read post]
Law, Technology & Arts Blog - http://wjlta.wordpress.com/
Rescuecom Files Reply Brief in Rescuecom v. Google
6 Mar 2007, 9:41 am
By Eric Goldman In the Second Circuit appeal of Rescuecom v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
preliminary injunction mandates corrective advertising for literal falsity
25 Jan 2013, 5:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Generac Power Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Disparagement doesn't cause TM confusion (and a covid-related claim)
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Dupart v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
MIROSA for Beer Confusable with MIRASSOU, a Strong Mark for Wine, Says TTAB
14 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
Cir. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Hotels + .com is still generic
6 Aug 2009, 1:07 am
Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §12:12 (4th ed. 2008) ("As Judge Posner remarked [in Ty Inc. v. [read post]
Florida IP - http://floridaip.blogspot.com/
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Hard Candy, LLC, v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc., Docket No. 18-10877
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
L.J. 505, 509 (1998); 1 McCarthy § 5:2. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Juice Generation gets a remand on PEACE LOVE AND JUICE mark
20 Jul 2015, 12:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2003) (third-party use can establish that mark is not strong);Fleetwood Co. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Links From "Regulatory Takings: Looking Back And Looking Forward" (Cal. State Bar Yosemite Conference)
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
McCarthy v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
Ninth Circuit "Eviscerates" Laches Defense Against Trademark Infringement
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
Nutrition Now, Inc., 304 F.3d 829, 838 (9th Cir. 2002); Tillamook Country Smoker, Inc. v. [read post]
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney - http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/
Court of appeals gives a little bitter and a little sweet to Splenda
6 Jan 2008, 1:18 pm
Heartland Sweeteners, LLC, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 4478981 (3d Cir.) [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Poorly Executed “Sign-in-Wrap” Contract Formation Process Fails–Berman v. Freedom Financial
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Sellers v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Precedential No. 21: TTAB Upholds Fraud Claim Against Distributor of Massage Chairs Who Registered Manufacturer's Mark FUJIIRYOKI
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
Cir. 2009); Nationstar Mortg. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
The Civil Service Law §58(1)(a) age requirements for appointment as a provisional or permanent police officer are within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Pursuant to this exception, defendant "need not prove that age is a [bona fide occupational qualification] for its police officers" (Kopec v City of Elmhurst, 193 F3d 894, 902 [7th Cir 1999]; see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d 177, 182 n 5 [2nd Cir 2006]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/