Search for: "Medical Protective Co. v. Bell"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
Moreover, UPS’s interpretation failed to carry out the important congressional objective in passing the Act—to overturn the Supreme Court’s holding and reasoning in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
We have a venue, this being the London offices of law firm Bircham Dyson Bell. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:28 pm
Frye Regional Medical Center. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:42 am
An employee with chronic back pain who took intermittent FMLA leave for more than two years, and was fired after his employer became suspicious of the patterns in the timing of his leave requests, could not advance FMLA interference and retaliation claims, ruled the Sixth Circuit ruled in an unpublished opinion (Tillman v Ohio Bell Telephone Co, October 8, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
I immediately thought about breach of implied warranties of fitness for purpose which have been found to apply to software and which under various consumer protection laws cannot be disclaimed. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
District http://t.co/pRretycdAF -> Antonick v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Becton, Dickinson & Co., 2013 WL 420332 (E.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:05 am
Jaszczyszyn v. [read post]
Suit By Gay Worker Shows Modern Trends: "Cat's Paw" Liability And "Gender Stereotype" Discrimination
4 Sep 2012, 9:27 am
However, the record reflected that his co-workers knew about it, and that his manager had required Koren to provide a medical note to justify extra bathroom breaks necessitated by his AIDS medication. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Liggett Drug Co., 112 N.E.2d 254, 257 (Mass. 1953) (coffee maker exploded in plaintiff‘s face); Bruns v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
Unfortunately, not all railroad crossings are protected by flashing lights, bells or gates. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:23 pm
It is very easy for a lawyer, in the zealous protection of that lawyer’s clients, to sow distrust, which ultimately may be severely to the detriment of any child and of the other players.The role of a lawyer is in my opinion to balance the protection of the client’s interests (which of course is a lawyer’s primary focus), but also, especially in a surrogacy matter, act in a spirit of trust, cooperation and collaboration.An owner of a highly successful… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:56 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
Pacific Bell (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 1225, 1240, 244 Cal.Rptr. 714 (Colich ); Kearl v. [read post]
