Search for: "Miller v. AT&T Corp. et al" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 pm by Steven Boutwell
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation et al., No. 13-211, 2014 WL 6633105 (M.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
– Texarkana 1998) (noting that “[t]here is no requirement in a toxic tort case that a party must have reliable evidence of a relative risk of 2.0 or greater”) Allison v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Hansmann, et al., The New Business Entities in Evolutionary Perspective [Feb. 2005]). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:02 am by Andrew Trask
  Further Reading: Martin Redish, et al., Cy Pres Relief & the Pathologies of the Modern Class Action: A Normative & Empirical Analysis, 62 Fla. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thus, for instance, Liqun Cao et al, Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am J Crim Just 85, 96 (2002), reports that 35 percent of a representative sample of Cincinnati residents age 21 and above said they would not be willing to shoot a gun at an armed and threatening burglar who had broken into their home. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Steve Davies
’” ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, “Endangered Species Act,” 172 (Donald Baur et al., eds., 2nd ed. 2010) (citing National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]