Search for: "Miller v. Rush" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2009, 11:33 pm
"The notion that a wife should get half of the joint assets of a couple after even a short, childless marriage has crept up on us without any parliamentary legislation to this effect" - Presumably, this is a reference to Miller, but Mrs Miller did not receive half of the joint assets, or anything like it. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
At 10.30am there were judgments from Mr Justice Tugendhat in TSE v News Group and Goodwin v News Group. [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Jamie Markham
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
The first travel ban was drafted by Trump policy aides Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller; Bannon has since been exiled from the White House, but news reports have identified Miller as the engineer of family separations, if not the drafter of the actual order. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Miller, finding that an affidavit in support of search warrant based on a dog sniff must establish the training and reliability of the drug-detecting dog. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:35 am
  The SWORDS robot made by Foster-Miller for the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am by John Floyd
In 2013, the Supreme Court let stand a 10-2 Louisiana jury verdict in the case of Miller v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
Miller, a pedestrian decision relating to information everyone knew was in the hands of third parties, rather than the outcome-dependent decision in Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381, which had two relists after the record arrived and five total, involves the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]