Search for: "Miller v. State of Alabama" Results 41 - 60 of 540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether, if not mandatory, the state can impose a sentence of life without parole on a juvenile homicide offender after the United States Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am by Jeff Welty
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm by Aurora Barnes
Idaho 17-236 Issues: (1) Whether the Eighth Amendment categorically prohibits life-without-parole sentences for juvenile offenders; and (2) whether, when the evidence demonstrates that the plaintiff lacks a prior history of violence and has high potential for rehabilitation, the state’s pre-Miller v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:55 pm by William Weinberg
PENAL CODE SECTION 1170 MAY OFFER RELIEF TO THOSE JUVENILES CONVICTED TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE I previously discussed the 2012 United States Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Suzanne Ito
Incredibly, the cases — from Alabama, Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Bill Otis
The Federalist Society asked me to write one paragraph for press distribution about today's decision in Miller v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Alabama on the Texas prosecutors' message board, and extensive coverage from Sentencing Law and Policy regarding litigation and legislation from other states related to Miller's retroactivity:Issue-spotting the mess sure to follow Miller's narrow (procedural?) [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
Mantich 13-1348 Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:50 am by The Federalist Society
” Montgomery sought state collateral relief, arguing that Miller rendered his mandatory life-without-parole sentence illegal. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Alabama in state collateral review proceedings because, according to the Virginia Supreme Court, a sentence imposed in violation of the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
After Monday's ruling, the state is still determining what action to take. [read post]