Search for: "Mintz v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:43 pm
”); Mintz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:03 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITTransportation
State Has Power to Order Private Rail Crossing's Closure to Prevent Possible Accident on Line
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil Practice
Firm's Civil Rights Law Actions Against Another Firm For Unauthorized Litigation Time-Barred
Mintz & Gold LLP v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
In the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz covers a recent visit by Justice Sonia Sotomayor to San Jose State University. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
The case is Matorin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:14 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:09 am
The court on October 2 will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): DiCampli-Mintz v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:14 am
Corp. v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:14 am
In today’s case (Dempsey v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Glossip v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Co. v Liebman, Adolf & Charme, 257 AD2d 424; VDR Realty Corp. v Mintz, 167 AD2d 986; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124 AD2d at 582; see also DePinto v Rosenthal & Curry, 237 AD2d 482, 482)". [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts of the week: Trade Secret and Covenant Not to Compete Posts, Cases and Articles: In the latest high profile battle over which state's law should apply (i.e., California v. every other state), sports agent Aaron Mintz is battling his former employer Priority Sports & Entertainment over the enforceability of his non-compete. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
For in tracing the historical development of church-state relations, the most recent work he cited was Thomas J. [read post]
