Search for: "Miranda v. Doe et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents Achmed et al. and the Center for Justice and Accountability as amici curiae in support of the petitioners.] [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
(Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents 3M Company et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents.) [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Dahl, et al., Science, 2003, 299, 96-99. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Wilson, et al, a 19-page opinion, Judge Crone writes:Ronald J. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Miranda Const. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
MCGILL, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Evidence -- Statements of defendant -- Private safety or rescue exception to Miranda rule where suspect is questioned by police officers when the suspect is confronted with a life-threatening medical emergency -- Where officers observed defendant chewing and attempting to swallow several pieces of crack cocaine, tried to stop defendant from swallowing too much of the substance, and asked defendant if he had any more crack cocaine in… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Leo, The Effect of Miranda v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
§ 1011 et seq., with regard to plaintiffs bringing tort claims for exposure to radioactivity. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
Hardwick (1986) to illustrate to readers how certiorari works, as well as internal drafts of opinions written in Miranda v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
Yet in laboratories all over the world, research has consistently shown that most commonsense behavioral cues are not diagnostic of truth and deception (DePaulo et al., 2003). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
The CGFoE Prize for Excellence in Legal Services is awarded to the Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic at Suffolk University and the Association of Maya Lawyers and Notaries in Guatemala for their exceptional advocacy in the case of Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
Paul, MN : Thomson/West, c2010.Criminal ProcedureKF9625 .W75 2010The Miranda ruling : its past, present, and future / Lawrence S. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
