Search for: "Murphy v. U.s.*" Results 41 - 60 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm by Josh Blackman
The lone citation from a conservative came in Justice Thomas's concurrence in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
Murphy involves New Jersey and New York’s Waterfront Commission Compact. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Lawson Fite
Prior to the release of Murphy’s letter, GSA stated, “An ascertainment has not yet been made. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Claims under Federal and State Racketeering Acts And Other Civil Remedies There are three types approaches to civil remedies a defendant might pursue to inhibit the flow of false claims in products cases. [read post]