Search for: "NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC." Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 12:33 am by Marie Louise
The lobbying push for a PTE (FDA Law Blog) US: Generics fees: A fantastic opportunity (profitability through simplicity) USPTO announces agenda for next BCP customer partnership meeting (Patent Docs) US: GOP candidates unified in opposition to embryonic cell research (Patent Docs) US: District Court Massachusetts: Method of detecting fetal down syndrome passes muster under Bilski‘s machine-or-transformation test: PerkinElmer, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The panel invited a response from Plaintiffs-Appellants Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:19 am by admin
Novo Nordisk A/S , U.S., No. 10-844, review granted 6/26/11 ). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:59 am by Matt Osenga
Novo Nordisk A/S is a case involving a particular aspect of the Hatch-Waxman Act as pertaining to pharmaceutical approval. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Novo Nordisk A/SDocket: 10-844Issue(s): Whether the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act applies when (1) there is “an approved method of using the drug” that “the patent does not claim,” and (2) the brand submits “patent information” to the FDA that misstates the patent's scope, requiring “correct[ion]. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:11 am by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release: Novo Nordisk Inc., a Danish pharmaceutical manufacturer, has agreed to pay $25 million to resolve its civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of its hemostasis management drug, NovoSeven, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
Rodriguez Title: Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:58 am by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Southern Division) ruled and issued an Order and Injunction requiring Novo Nordisk, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:20 am by Marie Louise
– Nova Biomedical fight for survival following patent threats from Abbott, Roche, Medtronic (IP Directions) Pathogens and the Nagoya Protocol of the Convention on Biological Diversity (PatentlyBIOtech) Australia: Federal Court punishes CSL for amendment delay: CSL Limited v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (Patentology) Australia: AusBiotech, legal academics and ARDR weigh in on gene patent debate (Patentology) Australia: Gene patent amendment bill introduced (IP… [read post]