Search for: "NYCTA" Results 41 - 60 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 7:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Rather, Plaintiff challenges Defendant NYCTA’s refusal to consider subsequent developments in his medical condition that could make him newly eligible for classification as a train operator. ... [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:12 pm
A 50-h injury hearing was held at the NYCTA offices on July 6, 2004. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
None of the other co-defendants oppose MABSTOA's and NYCTA's motion. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:08 am by Stephen Bilkis
None of the other co-defendants oppose MABSTOA’s and NYCTA’s motion. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The current tariff says the 7-day card is: “Valid for unlimited rides on NYCTA subway or … local bus …, taken within 7 days of initial swipe or dip of pass. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
The MTA defendants submit an affidavit from Kothari, which states that MABSTOA is a subsidiary of NYCTA whose sole area of responsibility is the operation of certain bus lines in Manhattan and the Bronx; it had no involvement in this project. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 2:45 pm
JF moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an order: (1) granting partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) as against defendants City of New York (City), MTA/New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Authority (MABSTOA), Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) (together, the Authorities), and MTA Capital Construction Company (MTACC) (collectively, the MTA defendants); and (2) setting this matter down… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:21 pm
The same holds true for the local counterpart of the MTA, the NYCTA. [read post]