Search for: "Nathan v. Nathan" Results 41 - 60 of 1,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 2:47 am by war
Janice Luck and Peiwen Chen have published at the Fortnightly Review an analysis of the High Court’s recent rulings in the trade mark cases: Gallo v Lion Nathan (the Barefoot case) and Health World v Shin-Sun. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm by Melissa L. Greipp
Bailey Briggs and Nathan Imfeld Ariane Strombom and Megan Zabkowicz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Nathan Rick Allred recently published an article entitled, The Uncertain Rights of the Unknown Child: Federal Uniformity to Social Security Survivors Benefits for the Posthumously Conceived Child After Astrue v. [read post]
11 May 2006, 2:01 am
Nathan Webb had a PR granted in State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:50 am by Kathy Kreps
By Kathy Kreps In a previous post, we discussed plaintiffs’ attempt in the class action lawsuit Mark v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
In 1762 the Earl of Halifax, one of His Majesty’s Principal Secretaries of State, despatched Nathan Carrington and three other of the King’s messengers to John Entick’s house in Stepney. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:11 pm
The Court has asked the SG to file a response in one of the DAD Duo cases: Foerster v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm by Barry Eagar
But it was successful on appeal to the Full Court (E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2009] FCAFC 27).By cross-claim in the Federal Court, Lion Nathan applied to have the registered trade mark removed from the register on the grounds of non-use from 7 May 2004 to 8 May 2007.The Full Court upheld the primary judge's finding that Lion Nathan's non-use application was made out and that Gallo's trademark should be removed from… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
Well, we all missed a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision -- quite a big one and an unusual one too -- Case C‑661/11, Martin Y Paz Diffusion SA v David Depuydt, Fabriek van Maroquinerie Gauquie NV, a ruling of the Third Chamber of Europe's favourite court that dates all the way back to 19 September. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The adage that “a picture tells a thousand words” (as noted in Campbell v MGN, Theakston v MGN and in von Hannover v Germany) remains a key consideration. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Sam Erman and Nathan Perl-Rosenthal, University of Southern California Law and History (more or less respectively), have published an op-ed on Tuaua v. [read post]