Search for: "Neil Barrett" Results 41 - 60 of 558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
” Justice Neil Gorsuch provides a (typically) concise summary of the unanimous opinion in Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm by Mark Graber
  By invoking Section Three against Donald Trump, Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett would silence forever claims that they are tools of the president who appointed them. [read post]
Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas voted to allow the Texas policy. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:09 pm by Amy Howe
Four justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – indicated that they would have denied the Biden administration’s request and allowed the lower court’s order to remain in place. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by SHG
” Justice Barrett asked, adding, “Isn’t it inviting a flood of litigation? [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judges Skeptical That Trump Is Immune from Jan. 6 Prosecution MSN – Rachel Weiner, Spencer Hsu, Perry Stein, and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 1/9/2024 A panel of three federal appellate judges expressed skepticism about Donald Trump’s claim to sweeping immunity from criminal prosecution and concerns about its implications, suggesting it would allow a future president to have a political rival assassinated by the military without repercussions. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Then in 2017, when Republicans controlled the Senate, they extended the simple-majority rule change to justices, too — and when Democrats wanted the filibuster to block the High Court nominations of Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett during the Trump administration, it was gone. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:48 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Neil Gorsuch appeared to agree with Alito. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, one imagines that Trump’s appointees—Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—would be especially uncomfortable about being seen as doing a favor for the man who put them where they are. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Justice Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed to be a Supreme Court justice in late October, 2020 (just before Donald Trump lost the election). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
But this time, despite the document’s length, Justice Neil M. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Here is the abstract: Justice Neil Gorsuch has now been on the Supreme Court for six years; Justice Brett Kavanaugh for five years; and Justice Amy Coney Barrett for three years. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:16 pm by Orin S. Kerr
But this time, despite the document's length, Justice Neil M. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
But Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett votes to grant cert. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm by Amy Howe
” In a four-page opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh, the court on Tuesday granted Laufer’s request. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
Such a rule, as far as both Kavanaugh and Justice Amy Coney Barrett were concerned, would allow the court to sidestep the 16th Amendment question altogether. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch told Garre that the term “appropriate” in Section 1123(b)(6) doesn’t mean “anything goes” but instead has “some limits. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Ronald Mann
The other justice clearly dissatisfied with the non-jury administrative proceeding was Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
Kavanaugh and Barrett appeared to disagree with the grounds upon which the state of Florida appealed the lower court’s ruling. [read post]