Search for: "Nollan v. California Coastal Commission" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
What the Sheetz: Where California Development Impact Fees Stand Following Recent Supreme Court Decision
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm by Whitney Hodges
California Coastal Commission (1987)483 U. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Sixth Circuit Invalidates Application of Nashville’s Sidewalk Ordinance Under The Takings Clause
15 May 2023, 9:43 am by Colter Paulson
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) or the deferential balancing test used for zoning restrictions under Penn Central Trans. v. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog - http://www.sixthcircuitappellateblog.com/
More on the Exam Dream
18 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
California Coastal Commission to be mostly wrong, after the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Lingle v. [read post]
SW Virginia law blog - http://swvalaw.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Revisits, Tightens Regulatory Takings Limits on Land Use Regulation
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm by Richard Frank
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
A Detailed Record Can Make All the Difference: Court Upholds Commission's Imposition of $5.3 Million Fee
23 Jun 2008, 4:56 pm
California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825; Dolan v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
California Supreme Court Rules that Ordinance Intended to Increase Number of Affordable Housing Units is a Lawful Exercise of the Police Power
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by Bryan W. Wenter and Ronny Clausner
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Ilya Somin] Supreme Court Oral Argument Indicates "Radical Agreement" that there is no "Legislative Exception" to the Takings Clause
10 Jan 2024, 9:58 am by Ilya Somin
California Coastal Commission, Dolan v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Latest property rights fight comes before justices
5 Jan 2024, 7:35 am by Amy Howe
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Constitutionality of Legislative Exactions Is Explained In Recent Journal Article Published By Abbott & Kindermann Inc.’s Senior Counsel.
28 Jun 2017, 11:45 am by Glen C. Hansen
California Coastal Commission, and Dolan v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Takings and the Supreme Court’s Decision in Koontz v. St. Johns River Management District
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm by Jarod Bona
California Coastal Commission—applies in review of monetary exactions. [read post]
The Antitrust Attorney Blog - http://www.theantitrustattorney.com/
The Sky’s the Limit – Sometimes
8 Dec 2014, 10:08 am by Scott Birkey
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
Lay of the Land - http://landuse.coxcastle.com/
Justice Lynn "Buck" Compton
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
See Nollan v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
Opinion recap: Broadening property owners’ right to sue
1 Jul 2013, 11:53 am by Tejinder Singh
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
New Sixth Circuit Decision Clarifies Important Takings Law
26 May 2023, 1:52 pm by Daniel F. Freedman
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). [read post]
California Land Use Blog - http://landuselaw.jmbm.com/
[Ilya Somin] Ninth Circuit Refuses to Reconsider Ruling that Mandating Union Organizer Access to Employer Property is not a Taking—but Eight Judges Dissent
29 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
California Coastal Commission].There, the Court stated that if California were to require landowners to "make an easement across their beachfront available to the public," there is "no doubt there would . . . be[] a taking. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Justice Scalia’s Enduring CEQA and Land Use Law Legacy
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
California Coastal Commission (1987) 483 U.S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Ilya Somin] Scalia and constitutional property rights
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am by Ilya Somin
In Nollan v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Holds Legislative Conditions Are Subject To Nexus-And-Proportionality Requirements
23 May 2023, 7:07 pm by Patricia Salkin
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). [read post]
Law of the Land - https://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/
[Josh Blackman] Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid Quietly Rewrote Four Decades of Takings Clause Doctrine
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm by Josh Blackman
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Justice Barrett on the Takings Clause and the Police Power
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/