Search for: "Octane Fitness, LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- In less than two weeks, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases involving the Attorney Fees provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:45 am
In both cases, the appealing party asserts that Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:59 pm
§ 284, that is the same as the rigid, two-part test this Court rejected last term in Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:10 pm
The second standard, a more relaxed totality of the circumstances analysis under the Patent Act, was announced by the Supreme Court in Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
Furthermore, Plaintiffs’ attorneys brought this suit two years before the Supreme Court’s decision in [Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:50 am
Matt PavichFor purposes of the Lanham Act’s fee-shifting provision, “exceptional” cases are those that stand out from others in the manner set forth for Patent Act fee awards in the Supreme Court’s holding in Octane Fitness, the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:15 am
See Thermolife Int’l, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:45 am
§ 285 in the Octane Fitness case, Judge Rader was seen criticizing the Federal Circuit’s established test in a concurrence to the Kilopass Tech. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
By Dennis Crouch Earlier this week, I commented on the two attorney-fees cases pending before the US Supreme Court: Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:42 am
Bottom line: The standard for awarding attorney fees was lowered back in 2014 by the Supreme Court in Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
The program provided Telscher, an attorney with Harness, Dickey & Pierce, an opportunity to prepare for a landmark intellectual property case, Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:16 am
Octane Fitness, LLC et al, 0-09-cv-00319 (MND September 1, 2015, Order) (Montgomery, J.) [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:23 pm
” Practice Tip: Under Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:15 am
No. 1503, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. (1946) (addressing the § 70 precursor to § 285); see also Octane Fitness, 134 S. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:31 am
” Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:46 pm
Now, under Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
