Search for: "Officer Paulsen"
Results 41 - 60
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
8) Is the President an "Officer" of the United States for purposes of Section 3? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:08 pm
Nearly three decades ago, Vikram and Akhil Amar argued that there is no difference between "Officers of the United States" and "Office[s] . . . under the United States," and the President is covered by both phrases. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
” Blackman and Tillman do make the odd claim that William Baude and Michael Paulsen in their influential article claiming that an originalist reading would disqualify Donald Trump under Section Three and my somewhat less famous (i.e., obscure) blog post “disregard the fact that the debates they cite from the 1860s in support of their position look back to debates from the early Republic. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
But Baude and Paulsen disregard substantial evidence about the meaning of the phrase “Officers of the United States” in the Constitution of 1788. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
But Baude and Paulsen disregard substantial evidence about the meaning of the phrase "Officers of the United States" in the Constitution of 1788. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
But Baude and Paulsen disregard substantial evidence about the meaning of the phrase "Officers of the United States" in the Constitution of 1788. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen seem to avoid this underlying debate over methodology, asserting an originalist approach from the outset and proceeding from there. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
How are lower courts—and for that matter college admissions officers—supposed to treat Bakke, Grutter, and Fisher? [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:44 pm
A state court judge in New Mexico has removed him from his office as a county commissioner and barred him from holding future office on the ground that he engaged in insurrection in violation of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment (14.3). [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
Enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, Section 3 states that "No person" can hold any state or federal office if they had previously held state or federal public office in the United States and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
The Two Experts, Part Two—Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stoke Paulsen We continue our exclusive discussion with the Professors Baude and Paulsen, authors of the bombshell article declaring Trump ineligible for the Presidency. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
Without regard to whether you accept or reject the argument proffered by Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, or even Larry Tribe and Judge Luttig, it leaves many questions unanswered. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
" That implies that Section 3 by itself disables insurrectionists and rebels from office, full stop, unless a super-majority of Congress acts. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:32 pm
The professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, make the case that unless Congress grants Trump amnesty, he cannot run for or hold the office of the Presidency again because of his behavior surrounding the events of January 6th. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Using this method of interpretation and historical research, Baude and Paulsen conclude that Trump has unequivocally run afoul of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment – the insurrection clause — by breaching his sworn oath of office to obey the Constitution. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:14 am
And Mike Paulsen was in my class at The Law School That Shall Not Be Named. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Ross Douthat has waded into the Section Three conversation, siding with Eric Segall against his fellow conservatives Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Despite the extensive research of Baude and Paulsen, their analysis ends where it began: Was January 6 an insurrection or rebellion? [read post]
