Search for: "P. v. Law"
Results 41 - 60
of 23,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Strikingly, Judge Pérez’s concurrence in Frutarom recognized that the court unnecessarily created new law, engaging in undue judicial policymaking. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:54 pm
The history is found at Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
The request for warrants is supplemented by a Report authored by a Panel of Experts in International Law, convened by the ICC Prosecutor in January 2024. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
As we said in Seila Law, "'[p]erhaps the most telling indication of [a] severe constitutional problem' with an executive entity 'is [a] lack of historical precedent' to support it. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
P. 15– 16. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
In fact, – in addition to the cases from the transition period – the choice of law rules of the Rome I and Rome II-Regulations previously incorporated into the domestic law, remained applicable as so-called retained EU law (REUL) due to their universal character (loi uniforme).[15] However, this approach was not appropriate for legal acts revolving around the principle of reciprocity, particularly in International Civil Procedure.[16] Hence, a… [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am
“Professional shortcomings or disagreements as to litigation strategy that do not involve intentional false statements in the context of litigation may sound in legal malpractice, but [*2]not in attorney deceit” under Judiciary Law § 487 (Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
16 May 2024, 2:09 pm
— Laurie Voss (@seldo) May 14, 2024 — Dylan Gibbswith Alexandra Son, Ethan Russell, Michel Hajjar, and Evan DysonTODAY'S DOCKET6-min readNegligent bylaw enforcementHospital vaccine mandatesContinuing encampmentsUnionized warehousesLacklustre expertsNEGLIGENCEOttawa on the hook for Uber crushing competitionMetro Taxi Ltd. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 8:30 am
The Supreme Court has decided Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am
Harper appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:03 am
The Voters” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
See Cellco P’ship v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:04 pm
LAW & DISORDER Performing Arts Division May 15, 2024 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: • A National Ban on Non-Compete Agreements • Paid v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
ref=broadbandbreakfast.com at p. 4. [read post]
