Search for: "PHILLIPS v. CHAMBERS"
Results 41 - 60
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:12 pm
His chambers has not responded to an inquiry about that. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
As the sub-heading of Gill Phillips’ Guardian piece puts it a “Two tier system is being created as rich male stars take advantage of privacy protection“. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:38 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
Phillip J. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:28 am
Phillips: Yesterday in oral argument in ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm
The case was Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
Stuart is the pupil at Three New Square, the specialist intellectual property chambers of Simon Thorley QC. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 8:26 am
Chamber of Commerce and a New Jersey pro-business organization filed suit on the grounds that the statute is preempted by the FAA. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:12 am
Topics featured in this issue include the following:* Gillian Davies, formerly of the European Patent Office and now a barrister in Hogarth Chambers, summarises significant decisions of the EPO boards of appeal in 2007;* Birgit Clark (Boult Wade Tennant) discusses the German Bundesgerichtshof COOL WATER/ICY COLD decision on the legitimacy or otherwise of allusive product names as a means of comparative advertising for imitative perfumes;* Marianne Schaffner and Sandra Georges (from… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Historian Kim Phillips-Fein describes how “many who read the memo cited it afterward as inspiration for their political choices. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:29 am
Lord Phillips (President) and Lord Rodger give the lead judgments. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:11 am
., et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:58 am
Problem was the Geneva Chamber of Commerce did not do international arbitration. 2. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 pm
Industries v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
