Search for: "Page v. Board of Adjustment"
Results 41 - 60
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
Garza, Esquire, Bellaire, Texas FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Marilee Fong, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: GRANT, MILLER, and MALPHRUS, Board Members. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:11 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 7:05 pm
This premise has been criticized by the Supreme Court in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, and, more recently by the Federal Circuit in Ultratec, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
Following on from the ECJ's decision in Coleman v Attridge Law protection from discrimination by association is covered by s.13 across the board, except for the protected characteristic of marriage/civil partnership. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
Following on from the ECJ's decision in Coleman v Attridge Law protection from discrimination by association is covered by s.13 across the board, except for the protected characteristic of marriage/civil partnership. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm
Viewed through the lens of editorial pages, Wednesday’s rule change was a watershed event. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on dosage regime – Swiss-type claims no longer available: G 2/08 – Dosage Regime/Abbot Respiratory (EPLAW) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (Patent Baristas) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on patenting a method of treatment by surgery: G1/07… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on dosage regime – Swiss-type claims no longer available: G 2/08 – Dosage Regime/Abbot Respiratory (EPLAW) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (Patent Baristas) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on patenting a method of treatment by surgery: G1/07… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The essentials in processing and challenging an employee disciplinary action where compulsory arbitration is involvedDavis v New York City Board/Department of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02544, Appellate Division, First DepartmentWhere the parties are subject to compulsory arbitration in determining an employee disciplinary matter pursuant to the terms and conditions set out in law or in a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law,… [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 3:04 am
The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion should include the reporter page number. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am
With the summons to oral proceedings, the board sent a communication pursuant to Articles 15(1) and 17(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) indicating to the appellant its preliminary, non-binding opinion of the case. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Angiomax (Bivalirudin) – US: Medicines Company files patent infringement suit against PLIVA, Barr, Teva following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) (America-Israel Patent Law) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) Humira (Adalimumab) – US: E D Texas find ‘close issue of claim construction’ supports JMOL of… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:54 am
District Court entered final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Contrary to the Court’s meek disclaimer, it was not at all clear that the holding in El Apple applied across the board, as opposed to just the employment context, where Texas substantive law is an analogue to federal civil rights law, and perhaps a few other select areas of law. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:22 pm
Whether the Board erred in concluding that Pavlinac's Application for Adjustment of Claim was timely filed. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Appeals Board (Waggoner) (2021) 86 Cal. [read post]
