Search for: "Page v. U.S. Postal Service" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§§ 1.6(a)(2), 2.195(a)(4), and 2.198 provide that certain correspondence deposited in the Priority Mail Express® service of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in accordance with 37 C.F.R. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
This is like saying that a ban on all books longer than 200 pages does not ban an “entire class” of books, because short books are still available. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
  And that name and address is of course displayed openly on my postal mail, handled by a wide variety of parties. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
However, in contrast to their fifteen-page Woodward dissent, this time, the Justices dissented without comment, declining even to cite their earlier opinion. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:49 am by John Day
Postal Service and there was not an affidavit from the mailing party. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:33 am by Josh Bell
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm by Victoria VanBuren
  He contends that Defendants worked hand in hand with the FBI, the DOJ’s Office of Criminal Investigation, the FDA, and the US Postal Service Office in joint coordinated activity with the State and its agents designed to develop and support the charges Defendants now seek to assert against him. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Jeralyn
Postal Service, Metro-Dade Department of Public Safety, and police departments from North Miami Beach, Aventura, Indian Creek and Homestead, Florida. [read post]