Search for: "Pair v. Doe 1 et al" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:05 am
Tobin’s Q around the start of activist hedge fund campaigns (sample of all hedge funds campaigns) Source: Cremers et al., November 2015, page 44. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:41 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Old Navy (Apparel), LLC et al, 1:15-cv-02633.Lilly Pulitzer was a Palm Beach socialite who married a member of the Pulitzer family (as in Pulitzer Prize). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:31 am by Jim Singer
The Ohio case is Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC et. al v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
  The question of whether Zuckerberg et al. could successfully "monetize" that platform has apparently been answered. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:04 am by Prashant Reddy
”[5]In a unanimous opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al., v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:00 am by stevehansen
   Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its post-remand opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al., v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:03 pm by George Wilson
District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv-01340-JSR   White et al v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
I mean really, how often does prior art have sex appeal? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
While ABX1 27 may force cities to make tough decisions, it does not mandate any payment and, according to the State, is not prohibited by Proposition 22. [read post]