Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 3:15 pm
STATE v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Con motivo de la celebración del sexagésimo quinto aniversario de la Declaración Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, el Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico (CAPR), la Comisión para los Derechos de los Inmigrantes, la Comisión de Derechos Humanos y la Comisión contra el Discrimen por Razón de Preferencia Sexual le invitan a participar del foro: United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:15 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard 9-10 March 2015. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:20 am
Amid the awful account of human suffering and international inertia contained in the just-released Report of the High-Level Mission on Darfur may be found an intriguing theory of state responsibility, a matter of recent concern in the Bosnia v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Bd. of Edn., 2009-Ohio-1970, ¶ 11. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
In today’s International Court of Justice judgment in the case of Croatia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
J.A. 87 ¶ 34. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 8:14 pm
The Utah Court of Appeal issued the decision in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:15 am
Secretary of State for Defence. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
(paras. 51 – 53). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc and others [2011] EWHC 910 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 138 “Para 1.5 of Practice Direction 39A supplementing CPR Pt 39 did not deem a hearing to be in private which had not been listed as a private matter. [read post]
Case Comment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:32 am
El 17 de julio de 2013 el Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos de América y el Departamento de Justicia del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico firmaron el “Agreement for Sustainable Reform of Puerto Rico Police Department”, como parte del caso núm. 3:12-cv-2039(GAG), United States of America v. [read post]
