Search for: "Paul A. Stewart" Results 41 - 60 of 1,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
New Report Outlines the Deep Political Polarization’s Slow and Steady March MSN – Paul Kane (Washington Post) | Published: 4/8/2023 New research by David Wasserman, senor editor at the Cook Political Report, examines all 435 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:33 pm by Jim Sedor
Reform Measures Won’t Stop It” by Stewart Yerton for Honolulu Civil Beat New Jersey: “Advocates See Few Upsides to Recent Pay-to-Play Overhaul” by Nikita Biryukov for New Jersey Monitor Pennsylvania: “The Philadelphia Board of Ethics Is Accusing Mayoral Candidate Jeff Brown of Illegally Coordinating with a Super PAC” by Chris Brennan, Sean Collins Walsh, Anna Orsco (Philadelphia Inquirer) for MSN Elections… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:46 pm by Stewart Baker
Paul and I note the UK's most recent paper on how to exercise cyber power responsibly. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Dan Bressler
” “But Knobbe partner and ethics committee chair Paul Stewart said in Tuesday’s response that Nike’s claims were false and that none of the Knobbe partners who worked for Nike in the past were familiar with the patents involved in the present suit. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Seán Binder
Phil Stewart and Michelle Nichols report for Reuters. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Idrees Ali, Phil Stewart and Steve Holland report for Reuters. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
Patent System (Source: The New York Times) Paul Stewart: Hostile IP Environment for Inventors Could Hamper US Innovation (Source: Bloomberg Law) Prof. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:46 am by Rob Robinson
” The project team includes (organizations listed for identification purposes): • Murali Baddula, Chief Digital Officer, Law In Order (Sydney, Australia)• Craig Ball, Attorney, Certified Computer Forensic Examiner, Adjunct Professor, University of Texas School of Law (Austin, Texas USA)• Klaus-Peter Finke-Härkönen, Director Strategic Initiatives, Cyber Diligence LLC, (Syosset NY USA)• Ian Folkman, Vice President – Forensic Technology at Deloitte Tohmatsu… [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am by Matthias Weller
“Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137 Beaumont, Paul; Holliday, Jane (eds.) [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm by Stewart Baker
Sticking with Congress, Paul takes the opportunity to explain the key takeaways from the not-so-bombshell House Oversight Committee hearing featuring former Twitter executives. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On 1 February 2023, the Supreme Court gave judgment on the private nuisance case of Fearn & Ors v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Stewart, reviewing Lex Pacificatoria, Jus Post Bellum, or Just “Good Practice”? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  I devoted a chapter to the critique by Paul Carrington not only of Critical Legal Studies as a way of analyzing law, but of the proposition that “crits” should necessarily be welcome within the American legal academy. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:06 pm by Bill Marler
Paul Kruse, President and CEO of Blue Bell Ice Cream, is faced a felony trial in 2022. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:33 pm by Bill Marler
Paul Kruse, President and CEO of Blue Bell Ice Cream, is faced a felony trial in 2022. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Chimène Keitner
” As Paul Stephan noted in his earlier post, “Dole Food Co. v. [read post]