Search for: "Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Minds" Results 41 - 60 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court currently has on its docket various cases pitting one or more states against the federal government, such as Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
A Cautionary Tale Most vapor product users also smoked cigarettes.[19] With this in mind, we can imagine the behaviors of vapers to mirror those of smokers. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Laufer (University of Pennsylvania), on Tuesday, November 12, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, Disclosure, ESG, Lobbying, Political spending, Transparency Remarks by SEC Chairman Clayton to the SEC’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee Posted by Jay Clayton, U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CEConvener: Reuel… [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 3 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Irwin, Haddon-Cave LJJ and Sir Jack Beatson) handed down judgment in the case of R (on the application of Ngole) v The University of Sheffield [2019] EWCA Civ 1127. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]